machine learning model accuracy
Processing Data To Improve Machine Learning Models Accuracy
Let's assume we want to forecast a variable e.g. Number Of Tweets and it is dependent on following two variables: Most Active Current News Type and Number Of Active Users. In this instance, Most Active Current News Type is a categorical feature. It can contain textual data such "Fashion", "Economical" etc. Additionally, Number Of Active Users contains numerical fields. Scenario: Before we feed the data set into our machine learning model, we need to transform categorical values into numerical values because many models do not work with textual values.
โ Benchmarking 20 Machine Learning Models Accuracy and Speed
As Machine Learning tools become mainstream, and ever-growing choice of these is available to data scientists and analysts, the need to assess those best suited becomes challenging. In this study, 20 Machine Learning models were benchmarked for their accuracy and speed performance on a multi-core hardware, when applied to 2 multinomial datasets differing broadly in size and complexity. It was observed that BAG-CART, RF and BOOST-C50 top the list at more than 99% accuracy while NNET, PART, GBM, SVM and C45 exceeded 95% accuracy on the small Car Evaluation dataset. On the larger and more complex Nursery dataset, we observed BAG-CART, BOOST-C50, PART, SVM and RF exceeded 99% accuracy, while JRIP, NNET, H2O, C45, and KNN exceeded 95% accuracy. However, overwhelming dependencies on Speed (determined on an average of 5-runs) were observed on a multicore hardware, with only CART, MDA and GBM as contenders for the Car Evaluation dataset.
โ Benchmarking 20 Machine Learning Models Accuracy and Speed
As Machine Learning tools become mainstream, and ever-growing choice of these is available to data scientists and analysts, the need to assess those best suited becomes challenging. In this study, 20 Machine Learning models were benchmarked for their accuracy and speed performance on a multi-core hardware, when applied to 2 multinomial datasets differing broadly in size and complexity. It was observed that BAG-CART, RF and BOOST-C50 top the list at more than 99% accuracy while NNET, PART, GBM, SVM and C45 exceeded 95% accuracy on the small Car Evaluation dataset. On the larger and more complex Nursery dataset, we observed BAG-CART, BOOST-C50, PART, SVM and RF exceeded 99% accuracy, while JRIP, NNET, H2O, C45, and KNN exceeded 95% accuracy. However, overwhelming dependencies on Speed (determined on an average of 5-runs) were observed on a multicore hardware, with only CART, MDA and GBM as contenders for the Car Evaluation dataset.